![discretionary fiscal policy vs automatic stabilizers discretionary fiscal policy vs automatic stabilizers](https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/287805144_Fiscal_Rules_Automatic_Stabilizers_and_Discretionary_Fiscal_Actions_Analyzing_an_Emerging_Economy/links/572243c108ae262228a5e8f8/largepreview.png)
Section II discusses the case for enhancing the automatic stabilizers. The rest of the paper is structured as follows. An example is fiscal legislation predetermining changes to tax rates or transfer rules contingent upon the occurrence of a macroeconomic event (a recession or an increase in unemployment beyond the trigger level).ģ. Temporary changes to tax and expenditure rules triggered by specific macroeconomic thresholds being reached. These would enhance the automatic response by tax collections or transfer payments (especially related to unemployment) to cyclical changes and Permanent changes to the tax and expenditure rules that enhance the traditional automatic stabilizers ( Box 1 provides a conceptual overview). An important policy question is, therefore, how the automatic stabilizers can be increased without raising the size of government. Increases in government size beyond a certain level may also weaken economic efficiency. 2 In turn, the size of government and the design of the tax system reflect societal, philosophical, and political views on the role of the state, equity, and social safety nets. The automatic stabilizers depend on the size of government and the cyclical responsiveness of the tax system-a rule of thumb is that the size of the stabilizers approximately equals the share of government in the economy times the output gap. However, stabilizers are by-products of choices regarding fiscal policy and institutions that are not focused on macroeconomic stabilization. Automatic stabilizers do not suffer from these shortcomings. Discretionary fiscal policy can be used in these cases, but has two shortcomings: it suffers from implementation lags, including a political decision-making process influenced by multiple (possibly contradictory) considerations and is not automatically reversed when the economic cycle improves, giving rise to a potential deficit bias. The global economic crisis has shown that during large demand shocks, monetary policy may not provide a sufficient response, particularly, when its transmission mechanism is impeded by the conditions of the financial system. Some governments have capped total welfare payments.1. Impact depends on the relative generosity of the welfare system such as base levels of payment for universal credit and unemployment support.Impact depends on whether a government allows the automatic stabilisers to operate fully – and does not introduce fiscal austerity measures such as real spending cuts during a slowdown / recession.A fiscal deficit is a net injection into the circular flow – thus helping to limit the depth / severity of a recessionĮvaluation: How effective are automatic stabilisers in the UK economy?.Combined, this will increase the budget deficit.And government spending on welfare support such as Universal Credit increases.As real incomes fall, people pay less in direct and indirect taxes and company tax payments also drop.During an economic recession, real output and employment contracts.Consequently, fiscal policy is taking income out of the circular flow – automatic stabilisers help moderate a boomĪutomatic stabilisers during an economic recession.As a result, government finances improve including a falling budget deficit / possible fiscal surplus.Government welfare spending then falls as more people are in work and require less state financial support.Tax revenues will rise as household real incomes and corporate profits grow – unemployment is declining.During periods of rapid economic growth (a boom phase).Automatic stabilisers are automatic fiscal changes as the economy moves through different stages of the business cycle – such as a fall in tax revenues from the circular flow during a recession or an increase in state welfare benefits when the unemployment rate is rising.Īutomatic stabilisers during strong economic growth